The Gold Horns — Context and Discussion
Edition facts
The catalog record for The Gold Horns — Context and Discussion provides practical reading context through 5,239 words, 23 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 21.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Danish poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Transcribed from the 1913 Thomas J. Wise pamphlet by David Price, email ccx074@pglaf.org. Many thanks to Norfolk and Norwich Millennium Library, UK, for kindly supplying the images from which this transcription was made.
TRANSLATED BY GEORGE BORROW
_from the Danish of_ ADAM GOTTLOB OEHLENSCHLÄGER
EDITED _with an Introduction by_ EDMUND GOSSE, C.B.
LONDON: PRINTED FOR PRIVATE CIRCULATION 1913
_Copyright in the United States of America_ _by Houghton_, _Mifflin & Co. for Clement Shorter_.
Early in the present year Mr. Thos. J. Wise discovered among the miscellaneous MSS. of Borrow a fragment which proved to be part of a version of Oehlenschläger’s _Gold Horns_. His attention being drawn to the fact, hitherto unknown, that Borrow had translated this famous poem, he sought for, and presently found, a complete MS. of the poem, and from this copy the present text has been printed. The paper on which it is written is watermarked 1824, and it is probable that the version was composed in 1826. The hand-writing coincides with that of several of the pieces included in the _Romantic Ballads_ of that year, and there can be little doubt that Borrow intended _The Gold Horns_ for that volume, and rejected it at last. He was conscious, perhaps, that his hand had lacked the skill needful to reproduce a lyric the melody of which would have taxed the powers of Coleridge or of Shelley. Nevertheless, his attempt seems worthy of preservation.
_The Gold Horns_ marks one of the most important stages in the history of Scandinavian literature. It is the earliest, and the freshest, specimen of the Romantic Revival in its definite form. In this way, it takes in Danish poetry a place analogous to that taken by _The Ancient Mariner_ in English poetry.
The story of the events which led to the composition of _The Gold Horns_ is told independently, by Steffens and by Oehlenschläger in their respective Memoirs, and the two accounts tally completely. Adam Gottlob Oehlenschläger (1779–1850), the greatest poet whom the North of Europe has produced, had already attracted considerable renown and even profit by his writings, which were in the classico-sentimental manner of the late 18th century, when, in the summer of 1802, the young Norwegian philosopher, Henrik Steffens, arrived in Copenhagen from Germany, where he had imbibed the new romantic ideas. He began to give lectures on æsthetics, and these awakened a turmoil of opposition. Among those who heard him, no one was more scandalised than Oehlenschläger, then in his twenty-third year. He was not acquainted with Steffens, but in the course of the autumn they happened to meet at a restaurant in Copenhagen, when they instantly experienced a violent mutual attraction. Steffens has described how deep an impression was made upon him by the handsome head, flashing eyes, and graceful vivacity of the poet, while Oehlenschläger bears witness to being no less fascinated by the gravity and enthusiasm of the philosopher. The new friends found it impossible to part, and sixteen hours had gone by, and 3 a.m. had struck, before Oehlenschläger could tear himself away from the company of Steffens.
He scarcely slept that night, and rose in a condition of bewilderment and rapture. His first act, after breakfast, was to destroy a whole volume of his own MS. poetry, which was ready for press, and for which a publisher had promised him a handsome sum of money. His next was to sit down and write _The Gold Horns_, a manifesto of his complete conversion to the principles of romanticism. Later in the day he presented himself again at Steffens’ lodgings, bringing the lyric with him, “to prove,” as he says, “to Steffens that I was a poet at last beyond all doubt or question.” His new friend received him with solemn exultation. “Now you are indeed a poet,” he said, and folded him in his arms. The conversion of Oehlenschläger to romanticism meant the conquest of Danish literature by the new order of thought.
Edmund Gosse's introduction to The Gold Horns immediately positions the poem as a landmark of Scandinavian Romanticism, comparing its significance to that of Coleridge's The Ancient Mariner. Gosse recounts the 1802 meeting between Oehlenschläger and the philosopher Henrik Steffens, a moment that sparked the poem's composition. This biographical framing invites readers to approach the text as both a personal and national artistic breakthrough.
The Introduction as a Reader's Compass
Gosse's introduction, though brief, supplies essential context. He notes that the manuscript was discovered among Borrow's papers, watermarked 1824, and likely intended for the 1826 Romantic Ballads. Gosse speculates that Borrow set it aside, feeling his translation could not match the original's melody. This admission primes the reader to consider the poem's sonic qualities and the challenges of translation. The introduction also highlights the poem's role in the Romantic Revival, calling it "the earliest, and the freshest, specimen" of that movement in Danish literature. For a first-time reader, these remarks create expectations of lyrical intensity and historical importance.
Borrow's Translating Hand
Though the excerpts do not include the poem's full text, the editorial apparatus reveals much about Borrow's approach. Gosse describes the handwriting as matching that of other pieces from 1826, suggesting a consistent period of labor. The translation was made from Danish, a language Borrow had studied, and the poem itself is a narrative lyric about ancient gold horns discovered in the earth. Borrow's version likely aimed to preserve the poem's rhythmic drive and folkloric tone. Readers should attend to how Borrow handles the poem's shifts between narrative and lyrical passages, and whether his English captures the original's "melody" as Gosse implies it may not.
The Poem's Voice and Structure
From the catalog metadata, we know The Gold Horns is a poem of about 5,200 words, placing it in the range of a long ballad or short narrative poem. The subject—gold horns unearthed from the ground—suggests a focus on ancient artifacts and their symbolic resonance. Oehlenschläger's original, written in Danish, would have employed a meter suited to oral recitation. Borrow's translation, completed in 1826, reflects the Romantic era's fascination with national antiquities. Readers should note how the poem balances description of the horns with meditative passages, and whether the voice remains consistent or shifts between a narrator and a more personal speaker.
A Fragmentary Record
The Project Gutenberg text includes only the introduction and the full Project Gutenberg license, not the poem itself. This means the excerpts available are entirely paratextual. A first reading of this digital edition is thus a reading about the poem rather than of it. The introduction becomes the primary text, and readers must rely on Gosse's framing and Borrow's reputation. This unusual situation underscores the importance of the editorial note: it is the only guide to a work that is present only by reference. Readers should treat the introduction as a lens, not a substitute, and seek out the poem's full text elsewhere if possible.
The available excerpts offer a unique entry point: they frame The Gold Horns as a pivotal work in Danish Romanticism and a translator's challenge. Readers approaching this digital edition should recognize that the poem itself is absent, and that the introduction and catalog data are the sole evidence. This note has aimed to orient you to the historical and textual clues present, so that when you encounter the poem in another form, you will read it with an awareness of its origins and its translator's careful, perhaps self-critical, hand.
There is a tenderness in watching a translated poem find its footing, the way Borrow’s Gold Horns lets Oehlenschläger’s voice breathe through careful choices. It reminds me of another quiet neighbor on my shelf, Kensington Rhymes — Themes and Context, whose gentle rhythms ask only for patience, not applause—two friends who whisper rather than proclaim.
Luke Clark
1 week agoRecord your reading impressions
A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.
James Green
3 weeks ago