Iberia Won; A poem descriptive of the Peninsular War With impressions from recent visits to the battle-grounds, and copious historical and illustrative notes — Reading Notes
Edition facts
Iberia Won; A poem descriptive of the Peninsular War With impressions from recent visits to the battle-grounds, and copious historical and illustrative notes — Reading Notes can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 89,441 words, 6 hr 29 min estimated reading time, and 27 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 21.3 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Peninsular War, 1807-1814 -- Poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
ëry Queen_ stanza must be regarded as a felicitous discovery rather than invention, and even the merit of the addition becomes diminished by the consideration that Alexandrine verse had become a great favourite amongst his contemporary poets before he used it. It was the favourite metre of a Howard and a Sidney at the commencement of the era of Elizabeth, and is frequently met in our alliterative poems, both early English and Anglo-Saxon. Yet Dr. Johnson has most erroneously represented Spenser as the inventor of the Alexandrine! But so fortunate was Spenser’s completion of the stanza, that all the attempts of Phineas Fletcher, Giles Fletcher, Prior, and even Milton, to improve on it were unavailing, and it may now be regarded as one of the special glories of England.
The stanza of Spenser, as used by that poet, was by no means the perfect musical stave that it is at present, so exquisitely attuned with the dominant quadruple rhyme for its key-note. Thomson appears to me to have brought it very nearly to perfection--his sole drawback being a too frequent indulgence in imperfect rhymes. In Byron’s fourth canto of _Childe Harold_ I conceive it to be brought to perfection. Spenser indulges constantly in imperfect rhymes, and though sometimes musical as well as often charmingly fanciful and suggestive, he was by no means such a master of language and rhythm as Shakspeare, whose influence, followed up by the examples of Milton, Dryden, and Pope, is felt in the excellence of the poetical diction of the poets of this century. Though Spenser in some degree discovered the stanza which bears his name, he did not complete the discovery, for his Alexandrine is commonly deficient in the cæsural pause, which is absolutely essential to the satisfaction of the ear and to the majestic close of the stanza, and now almost as much _de rigueur_ as it is in the French Alexandrine, which is the common heroic measure of our neighbours. The Alexandrine in every second stanza of Spenser is without it, and the effect is very bad, as may be seen from the following examples:--
“So shall wrath, jealousy, grief, love, die and decay.” “You shame-faced are but Shame-facedness itself is she.” “Save an old nymph, hight Panope, to keep it clean.” “Of turtle doves, she sitting in an ivory chaire.” “And so had left them languishing ’twixt hope and feare.” “Excludes from faire hope withouten further triall.” “All mindless of the golden fleece which made them strive.” “The other back retired, and contrary trode.” “With which it blessed concord hath together tied.” “Did waite about it, gaping griesly, all begor’d.” “Yet spake she seldome, but thought more the less she said.” “But of her love to lavish, little have she thank.” “And unto better fortune doth herself prepare.” “Fails of her souse, and passing by doth hurt no more.” “Forgetful of his safety hath his right way lost.” “But with entire affection, and appearance plaine.” “Great liking unto many, but true love to few.” “Into most deadly danger and distressed plight.” “Whilst loving thou mayst loved be with equal crime.” “They have him taken captive, tho’ it grieve him sore.” “So kept she them in order, and herself in hand.” “’Mongst which crept the little angels through the glittering gleames.” “And thereout sucking venom to her parts intire.” “Ease after war, death after life, does greatly please.”
Admitting the richness and fertility of Spenser’s fancy, I cannot find that he has depth, originality, or brilliancy of thought to compensate for a roughness, which is amazing by the side of Shakspeare’s exquisite versification, or to justify the high opinion expressed by Wordsworth. Compare Spenser’s Description of Lucifer’s Palace, commencing
“A stately palace built of squared brick, “Which cunningly was without mortar laid”
with Milton’s Pandemonium!
The preface immediately establishes a personal frame: the author spent six years in the Peninsula, much of it in “severe sickness,” and writes from “constrained absence” from Britain. This biographical note colors the poem as a work of long meditation rather than immediate reportage. The verse itself adopts the Spenserian stanza—nine lines with a final alexandrine—a form associated with epic romance. Yet the excerpt from Canto VI undercuts any chivalric expectation: after a brief elegy for a fallen “youthful Chief” and two Spanish women, the poem turns to a furious denunciation of “the hideous brood / Spawned by the Passions in the hour of strife.” The same canto that mourns individual heroism also describes soldiers as “drunk volunteers” and “vile camp-followers,” and directly addresses Ambition: “Look here, Ambition, here: thy handiwork behold!”
The historical notes that follow each canto provide a second layer. In the note to Canto VI, Hughes quotes Napier and General Jones on the assault on San Sebastian, then criticizes Jones’s “coldness” and contrasts Vauban’s cautious maxims with British practice. This interplay between poetic outrage and scholarly annotation is the work’s distinctive structural feature.
The Spenserian Stanza as a Vehicle for War
The poem uses the Spenserian stanza throughout, a choice that signals an ambition to align the Peninsular War with the tradition of The Faerie Queene. Each stanza consists of eight iambic pentameter lines followed by an alexandrine (six feet), with a rhyme scheme ababbcbcc. In the excerpt, this stately form carries both elegy—“Mourn, San Sebastian, for the beauty blighted”—and savage indictment: “Still roars the thunder-storm—Day wears the gloom / Of Night’s black canopy, and wears it well.” The regularity of the meter contrasts with the disorder described, creating a tension between formal control and chaotic content. Readers should note how Hughes uses the final alexandrine to drive home a point or shift tone, as in the stanza ending “A plundering pathway hew thro’ havoc, blood, and tears.”
Historical Notes as Counterpoint
Each canto is followed by “Historical and Illustrative Notes” that often run longer than the verse itself. The note to Canto VI, for example, cites Napier, Jones, and Gleig, then disputes General Jones’s account of artillery fire during the assault on San Sebastian. Hughes writes that Jones’s “coldness is owing to the departure from the rules of art,” and quotes Vauban’s maxim that sieges should avoid open force. This scholarly apparatus does not simply verify the poem; it argues with other historians. The notes also identify the real actors behind the poem’s characters: the tearing down of the tricolor, assigned to the fictional Nial, is attributed to Lieutenant Gethin. Readers moving between verse and notes will see Hughes deliberately fictionalizing while insisting on factual accuracy.
Shifts in Voice: From Elegy to Invective
The excerpt from Canto VI shows a rapid tonal shift. Stanzas XXXV–XXXVII mourn a “youthful Chief,” Blanca, and Morton in language that recalls pastoral elegy: “So graceful ne’er again your fleet shall glide.” But stanza XXXVIII opens with “Still roars the thunder-storm” and immediately descends into a catalog of horrors: “Drunk volunteers, / Mad soldiers, vile camp-followers, knaves who swell / The array of War.” The next stanza directly apostrophizes a “villain” and compares him to Attila and Alaric. This abrupt movement from lament to condemnation is characteristic of the poem’s moral stance. Hughes does not sustain a single heroic register; instead, he juxtaposes the nobility of individual sacrifice with the savagery of collective violence. The preface’s claim to “sustain the glory of England” is complicated by these passages that indict war itself.
Locality and Personal Experience
The preface emphasizes that the work is “the result of six years’ residence in the Peninsula” and “many excursions through Spain and Portugal.” This geographical grounding appears in the notes, which refer to specific battlefields and fortifications. The note to Canto VI discusses the “batteries on the right of the Urumea” and the curtain wall at San Sebastian. Hughes’s “recent visits to the battle-grounds” (as the title states) give the poem a topographic specificity that distinguishes it from purely literary epic. The reader should attend to place names and landscape details in the verse, as they often correspond to locations the author walked. The preface also mentions “meditative habits in an isolated life,” suggesting that the poem’s perspective is that of a solitary observer rather than a combatant, which may explain the alternating distance and passion in the narration.
Because the excerpts cover only the preface and part of Canto VI, the full arc of the twelve-canto structure remains unknown. The poem may sustain the tension between heroic commemoration and anti-war critique, or it may resolve into a more conventional patriotic narrative. Readers are advised to sample the notes alongside the verse, as the two genres constantly reinterpret each other. The Spenserian stanza rewards slow reading, and the historical apparatus invites cross-checking. Approach Iberia Won as a hybrid work—part poem, part travel memoir, part military history—and let the dissonances between its parts guide your attention.
Reading about Iberia's battlefields reminded me of standing on a hill in Portugal myself, years ago, where the only sound was wind in the olive trees. That same quiet ache for lives lost came back to me with Satan Absolved: A Victorian Mystery — Reading Notes, where guilt hangs over everything like a low cloud. Both books feel haunted by what words cannot quite carry.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.
Lucas Walker
1 month ago