The Day of Doom; Or, a Poetical Description of the Great and Last Judgement — Inside the Classic

(7 User reviews)   2330
Wigglesworth, Michael, 1631-1705, Dean, John Ward, 1815-1902 [Contributor], Mather, Cotton, 1663-1728 [Contributor] Project Gutenberg 2017 Not confirmed
Judgment Day -- Poetry Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 26,823
Reading time 117 min
Text sections 4

This digital edition of The Day of Doom; Or, a Poetical Description of the Great and Last Judgement — Inside the Classic is described by source-level measurements including 26,823 words, 1 hr 57 min estimated reading time, and 4 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 19.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Judgment Day -- Poetry,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Michael Wigglesworth's 1662 poem in ballad meter depicts the Last Judgment through dramatic dialogues between sinners and Christ, using stark imagery and theological argumentation that reflects Puritan doctrine.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

ed in 1715, called “the 6th edition, enlarged, with Scripture and marginal notes”—“printed by John Allen, for Benjamin Eliot, at his shop in King street.” From this edition, which was evidently the seventh, the present one is reprinted, being carefully compared with that of 1673. Another edition appeared in 1751, “Printed and sold by Thomas Fleet, at the Heart and Crown, in Cornhill,” Boston. The next edition appeared in 1811, “Published by E. Little & Company, Newburyport,” Mass. The last edition, prior to the present, was published in Boston in 1828, by Charles Ewer.

Besides the _Day of Doom_ Mr. Wigglesworth published, in 1669, “Meat out of the Eater; or, Meditations concerning the necessity and usefulness of Afflictions unto God’s Children.” The “fourth edition” appeared in 1689, and subsequent editions in 1717 and 1770. In 1686 he preached an Election Sermon, which was printed by the colony. Among his unpublished writings is a poem entitled “God’s Controversy with New England, written in the time of the great Drought, Anno 1662. By a lover of New England’s prosperity.”

Mr. Wigglesworth borrowed little from other poets, and what he borrowed was probably from the commentaries and theological treatises with which his library abounded, rather than from the poets. Not that his style is wholly prosaic, for there are passages in his writings that are truly poetical, both in thought and expression, and which show that he was capable of attaining a higher position as a poet than can now be claimed for him. The roughness of his verses was surely not owing to carelessness or indolence, for neither of them was characteristic of the man. The true explanation may be, that he sacrificed his poetical taste to his theology, and that, for the sake of inculcating sound doctrine, he was willing to write in halting numbers.

The author of the _Day of Doom_, belonging to the straitest sect of Puritans, was, like many others of that sect, a man of generous feeling toward his fellows. Rev. Dr. Peabody calls him “a man of the beatitudes.” Obedience to the supreme law gave a heavenly lustre to his example and a sweet fragrance to his memory. The clergy of his day possessed a deep religious earnestness and a fervent piety. They were Bible students and men of prayer. Even many who consider them erroneous in doctrine, are willing to allow that they were strict in morals; that, if they were wrong in faith, they were right in life; that, if their creed was opaque, their hearts were luminous; and that, if their vision did not discern the additional light which the saintly Robinson had prophesied was yet to break forth from God’s Word, they sincerely accepted the light they saw. They were patient, hopeful, humble, believing, faithful. They stood on a higher plane than their successors, and exercised a proportionally higher power over their hearers. Their people revered them, were constant in attendance on their services, and submitted gladly to their sway.

Michael Wigglesworth’s The Day of Doom (1662) opens with a sudden cosmic alarm: the Judge descends, and the dead rise from their graves. The poem’s ballad stanzas—fourteeners in alternating rhyme—drive a relentless pace, matching the urgency of its subject. Wigglesworth does not merely describe judgment; he stages it as a courtroom drama. Sinners plead their cases, and Christ answers them point by point. The excerpt shows the damned arguing that Adam’s sin should not be imputed to them, only to be told that Adam was their “public Head” and that they would have done the same. This back-and-forth, with its legalistic precision, gives the poem a distinctive voice: at once homiletic and theatrical.

Ballad Meter and Propulsive Rhythm

Wigglesworth writes in common meter—alternating lines of eight and six syllables—but his stanzas are longer, often eight lines, with the rhyme scheme aabbccdd. The meter is regular, almost sing-song, which made the poem easy to memorize and recite. In the excerpt, the rhythm drives the argument forward: “If for our own transgressi-on, / or disobedience. / We here did stand at thy left hand, / just were the Recompense.” The forced rhyme and occasional syncopation (like “transgressi-on” split across a line) create a sense of oral performance. This is verse meant to be heard in a meetinghouse, not read silently. The pace never slackens; even the sinners’ pleas are delivered in the same pounding meter, as if the form itself enforces the inevitability of judgment.

Theological Argument as Dramatic Dialogue

The poem’s central device is the exchange between the damned and the Judge. In the excerpt, sinners protest that Adam’s guilt is unfairly imputed to them: “How could we sin that had not been, or how is his sin our, / Without consent, which to prevent we never had the pow’r?” The Judge’s reply is a miniature treatise on federal headship: Adam “was design’d of all Mankind to be a public Head; / A common Root, whence all should shoot, and stood in all their stead.” Wigglesworth turns abstract doctrine into direct speech, giving each side a voice. The sinners’ arguments are not straw men; they are the very objections a 17th-century congregation might raise. The Judge’s answers are equally concrete, using analogies (the root and the shoot) and rhetorical questions. This dialogic structure makes the poem a kind of catechism in verse, where doctrine is enacted rather than asserted.

Imagery of Light, Darkness, and the Body

Though the excerpt focuses on argument, the poem elsewhere relies on vivid sensory imagery. The opening describes the “great and last Judgment” with fire, trumpets, and the Son of Man “coming in the clouds of Heaven with power and great glory.” The damned are pictured standing “hopeless and helpless before an imp” (the text breaks off). Wigglesworth uses physical details to make the spiritual tangible: the “left hand” of the Judge, the “easiest room in Hell,” the “ark of safety.” The body is central—the dead rise, the wicked tremble, the elect are saved. This is not a quiet meditation but a sensory assault, meant to provoke fear and hope. The poem’s power lies in its refusal to let doctrine remain abstract; it forces the reader to imagine the scene, to hear the arguments, to feel the weight of judgment.

Readers approaching The Day of Doom should attend to its oral quality: read it aloud to feel the meter and the force of the arguments. The poem rewards attention to its structure—each stanza is a unit of thought, often with a turn or a reply. The 1867 edition includes a memoir by John Ward Dean and a sketch by Cotton Mather, which provide context but are not part of the poem itself. The text is best understood as a work of popular theology, not as a literary artifact in the modern sense. Its value lies in what it reveals about Puritan belief and the ways verse could make doctrine memorable.

That rain fell hard against the windows, and Wigglesworth’s stern verses made the room feel warmer by contrast. I kept thinking about the quiet souls in his margins, the unnamed ones. Later, half-dreaming, I reached for something gentler and found The Hidden Servants and Other Very Old Stories — Edition Insights, where even the smallest figures carry their own light.

David Martinez
2 weeks ago

Emma Hall
3 weeks ago

John Miller
3 weeks ago

Matthew Young
2 weeks ago

Liam Martin
1 month ago

4.5
4.5 out of 5 (7 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

How much effort did this book require?

Related eBooks